Lina89: комментарии

I only hope that insufficient evidence of guilt will be enough for CAS.....
The Oswald Commission, which was set up by the International Olympic Committee IOC in connection with the doping system described by Prof. McLaren at the Olympic Games Sochi 2014 in Russia, is part of the result management against the individual athletes, presented on Friday evening their investigation results to he two country Alexander Legkov and Evgeniyi Belov to WIESCHEMANN | Lawyers and scheduled the hearing for the end of October.
The IOC was last repeatedly criticised because it had not yet completed the investigation 15 months after the McLaren report I was submitted and the start of the competitions in the winter season is upcoming. The reason of the delay is WIESCHEMANNN | Lawyers not known. We would also have appreciated to have had a previous completion.
However, we believe that Thomas Bach the IOC path, not to decide without a secure factual basis on possible sanctions against Russia and a possible exclusion from the Olympic Winter Games 2018 in Pyeongchang is right. We also expressly welcome the diligence of the disciplinary commission led by Dennis Oswald in the search for evidence of the guilt or innocence of individual athletes. The fact that the Oswald Commission has complied with its commitment to hold the hearing before the expiry of the provisional suspension at the 31.10.2017 is an expression of fairness to the athletes involved and to the FIS.
In the matter itself, the results of the investigation did not surprise the defence. The results do not go beyond the facts on which the Court of Arbitration for Sport CAS/TAS has already based its judgment on the 29.5.2017. The evidence is not sufficient to prove that Alexander LEGKOV and Evegniyi BELOV have known or even involved in the exchange of their Beregkit sample bottles.
The two procedures will be the first to be dealt with by the Oswald Commission. Despite the individuality of each case and each individual athlete, the procedures will have exemplary effect.

The Oswald Commission, which was set up by the International Olympic Committee IOC in connection with the doping system described by Prof. McLaren at the Olympic Games Sochi 2014 in Russia, is part of the result management against the individual athletes, presented on Friday evening their investigation results to he two country Alexander Legkov and Evgeniyi Belov to WIESCHEMANN | Lawyers and scheduled the hearing for the end of October.
The IOC was last repeatedly criticised because it had not yet completed the investigation 15 months after the McLaren report I was submitted and the start of the competitions in the winter season is upcoming. The reason of the delay is WIESCHEMANNN | Lawyers not known. We would also have appreciated to have had a previous completion.
However, we believe that Thomas Bach the IOC path, not to decide without a secure factual basis on possible sanctions against Russia and a possible exclusion from the Olympic Winter Games 2018 in Pyeongchang is right. We also expressly welcome the diligence of the disciplinary commission led by Dennis Oswald in the search for evidence of the guilt or innocence of individual athletes. The fact that the Oswald Commission has complied with its commitment to hold the hearing before the expiry of the provisional suspension at the 31.10.2017 is an expression of fairness to the athletes involved and to the FIS.
In the matter itself, the results of the investigation did not surprise the defence. The results do not go beyond the facts on which the Court of Arbitration for Sport CAS/TAS has already based its judgment on the 29.5.2017. The evidence is not sufficient to prove that Alexander LEGKOV and Evegniyi BELOV have known or even involved in the exchange of their Beregkit sample bottles.
The two procedures will be the first to be dealt with by the Oswald Commission. Despite the individuality of each case and each individual athlete, the procedures will have exemplary effect.

So, Rodchenkov’s word is more important than scientific evidence. Does that apply to Chinese, British, American, Norwegian, Canadian athletes and their whistlebowers or not .....
They are all equal, but some are more equal than the others

Yes, that are all атхлетес who have three medals, and therefore 3 samples. I know that the Russians do not have a sportsman with 3 medals in Vancouver, but someone of the Russians can have 3 samples, since all of their samples are surely retested. That was the point of my comment. It can be someone with two medals or even one.

You should consider Terzic, instead.

number of events
for example Martin Fourcade participate in 5 races and has better chance to give 3 samples than Scott Moir who participate in one event in Vancouver
hope you understand better know

Sorry, if I do not possess a very high level of English knowledge, which is needed to talk to you ... English is my second language, and Russian unfortunately I do not know ..... my professor taught me that grammar is not the most important , at least no more than word knowledge and constant practice ... it’s stupid to assume my education level solely based on my knowledge of English ... otherwise I am graduate physicist

I didn’t translate, but thanks for чудо
By the way, I agree with your translation.

maybe, but if someone is competing in more events, like for example Shipulin (example only), there could be more than one sample taken.... it mostly depends of number of event in which athlete is competing

fine, sorry, thanks