Кириос о том, что Синнер завел ютуб-канал: «Надеюсь, у него есть закадровая съемка того, что произошло год назад 😂»

А Ник что-то никак остановиться не может. Пластиночку заело) Завидует)))

Зачёт)

Пункт 107 из решения трибунала ITIA The third factual dispute identified by the Parties relates to the alleged warning given by Mr Ferrara to Mr Naldi, in relation to the Trofodermin Spray, the fact that it contained Clostebol (a Prohibited Substance), and that it should not be applied anywhere near the Player. Mr Ferrara, in his evidence, was clear that this warning was given to Mr Naldi, whereas Mr Naldi stated whilst being cross-examined that he could not remember any such warning being given. Mr Naldi could also not recollect a request being made to him that he should only use the Spray in Mr Ferrara’s bathroom, but he did accept that this was the only location in which he ever did actually apply the Spray. The Tribunal considers that, on balance, Mr Ferrara’s version of events is more compelling given that he had a clear recollection of the instructions he communicated versus Mr Naldi’s broad nonrecollection, the fact that Mr Ferrara was extremely experienced in matters of anti-doping, that he himself had pharmaceutical training, and that the accepted use of the Spray solely in Mr Ferrara’s bathroom was in keeping with the warning provided to Mr Naldi. In addition, as it was suggested by the Parties, Mr Naldi’s appreciation of what Mr Ferrara said to him about the Spray may have been adversely affected by the fact that he had arrived later than the others, may have been jetlagged, and was under some family pressure at that time.