БОЛЕЕМ! 07-го августа 2017 года

Его случай очень похоже на случай Марии. СМИ называют его "обманщик", "дважды допингист" и т.п., а решение Трибунала, как и решение CAS о Марии специально отмечает, что он не обманщик, что не имел за цель обманить систему, что он не допингист. Даже текст решения для него сильнее текста для Марии! 9. This Panel is very concerned that Mr. Gatlin’s reputation not be unnecessarily tarnished as a result of this decision. Anti-Doping rules are like other sporting rules in that sometimes there are adverse consequences even when an athlete is not at fault. The Panel specifically notes that, in this case, Mr Gatlin neither cheated nor did he intend to cheat. He did not intend to enhance his performance nor, given his medical condition, did his medication in fact enhance his performance. At most, his mistake was in not raising his medical condition for a review with the appropriate authorities before the race, instead of after it. The Panel requires that this fact be made clear in any public release describing or relating to this decision. И вопреки это, Вы видите, как к ним относятся журналисты и СМИ. Вот почему, надо постоянно повторять решение CAS о Марии, иначе и с ней может случится тоже самое.

Мария получила WC в Пекин.

Рекомендую прочитать: Demonising Justin Gatlin Mike Morgan @MSL_Mike MIKE.MORGAN@MORGANSL.COM The common perception, bolstered by the media, is that US sprinter Justin Gatlin has twice used performance-enhancing drugs in an attempt to cheat. It might surprise readers to know that no tribunal has ever made such a finding. In this article Mike Morgan, Founding Partner of Morgan Sports Law LLP, explains how the media’s portrayal of Gatlin (pictured) is based on inaccurate information, and potentially libellous. http://www.sportsintegrityinitiative.com/demonising-justin-gatlin/